Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen has firmly rejected allegations linking him to a high-value land dispute in Kiambu County, describing the claims as inaccurate and unfounded.
In a statement released Tuesday night through the Ministry of Interior’s communications office, the CS dismissed a media report that suggested his involvement in an alleged land-grabbing scheme tied to a prime parcel in the Runda area.
Murkomen maintained that the accusations were built on speculation and misinformation, emphasizing that he has no personal or indirect interest in the property in question. He further stated that he is unfamiliar with the land, its location, or any dispute surrounding it, distancing himself completely from the controversy.
“The Cabinet Secretary has no knowledge whatsoever of the alleged property or any dispute connected to it,” part of the statement read, underscoring his position that the claims lack factual basis. He reiterated that he has never participated in any transactions or discussions regarding the land.
Addressing assertions that he may have influenced police involvement in the matter, Murkomen clarified that his role does not extend to directing operational activities within the National Police Service. He explained that his mandate is limited to setting policy guidelines, which are implemented through the office of Inspector General Douglas Kanja, rather than engaging in day-to-day policing decisions.
The CS also urged investigative authorities to fast-track inquiries into the dispute, calling for the protection of legitimate landowners and due process for all parties involved.
The controversy follows a report by Daily Nation detailing a prolonged ownership conflict over a 300-acre property in Runda, estimated to be worth Ksh20 billion. The report alleged that Murkomen, alongside Kapseret MP Oscar Sudi and Gatundu North MP Elijah Kururia, had been mentioned in claims of backing individuals accused of occupying the land.
Petitioners, including members of the Mbugua family, allege that more than 200 individuals have encroached on the property, reportedly with the support of influential figures and compromised security officers. However, Murkomen insists any police deployment in such disputes is routine and should not be misinterpreted as political interference.